From medieval principle to modern scientific instrument. Here’s how a simple idea continues to shape the way we think.
Occam’s razor is a philosophical principle that suggests preferring the simplest possible explanations. Although its origins date back to the 14th century, this concept continues to be widely used in modern scientific research.
Advertisement
The name “Occam’s razor” comes from William of Occam, a Franciscan friar and English philosopher who lived between 1285 and 1347. However, the idea underlying this principle was already present in the thinking of other philosophers before him. Aristotle, for example, argued that “the most limited, if adequate, is always preferable,” while Ptolemy stated that “we consider it a good principle to explain phenomena with the simplest possible hypothesis.”
Read also:
From the Latin maxim to the modern concept
The friar’s original formulation, in Latin, read: “Numquamponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate”, which means “Plurality must never be posited without necessity”. In other words, one should not multiply entities beyond what is necessary when trying to explain a phenomenon.
The term “razor” in this context metaphorically refers to the act of “scraping away” superfluous assumptions when comparing two theories. The goal is to arrive at the most essential and parsimonious explanation possible, without sacrificing scientific accuracy or validity.
How Occam’s razor is applied in science
In science, Occam’s razor is used as a kind of rule of thumb to guide researchers in developing theoretical models. This principle finds application in numerous fields, from evolutionary biology to medical diagnostics. However, it is important to underline that this is not an absolute law, but rather a useful heuristic to guide scientific thinking.
A classic example of the application of Occam’s razor in the history of science concerns Einstein’s theory of special relativity. This theory was able to explain the observed phenomena without the need to postulate the existence of the aether, a hypothetical medium through which electromagnetic waves were thought to propagate. Einstein’s theory, simpler and more elegant, was preferred to alternative explanations that required the introduction of additional and unverifiable concepts.
The limits of Occam’s razor
Despite its usefulness, Occam’s razor is not free from criticism and limitations. In some cases, the pursuit of simplicity may lead to overlooking more complex but more accurate explanations. The history of science teaches us that sometimes the apparently simplest theories have proven inadequate in the face of new experimental evidence. This is the case, for example, of the first simplistic explanations for phenomena such as meteorites, ball lightning or continental drift, which had to be revised and expanded as new data accumulated.
It is essential to understand that Occam’s razor does not necessarily imply choosing the simplest theory of all, but rather the one that best fits the available evidence without introducing unnecessary hypotheses. As Isaac Newton stated: “We must admit no more causes of natural things than are true and sufficient to explain their appearances.”
The “reverse Occam’s razor” and its risks
In recent years, some scientists have raised concerns about an opposite trend, which we might call a “reverse Occam’s razor.” This trend consists of proposing overly complicated and sensational theories, often aligned with the buzzwords of the moment, in the hope of gaining greater visibility and funding. This approach risks undermining one of the fundamental principles of the scientific method and hindering the progress of knowledge.
To counteract this drift, some scientific journals have begun to explicitly ask reviewers to evaluate whether experimental data presented in a paper could be explained by simpler models or theories. This approach aims to bring attention back to the parsimony and essentiality of scientific explanations.
The balance between simplicity and complexity
Occam’s razor remains a valuable tool in scientific and philosophical thought, inviting us to seek simplicity without sacrificing rigor. However, it is important to use it with caution, remembering that nature may prove more complex than our initial theories might suggest. As Einstein stated: “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler than that.”
The challenge for scientists is to find a balance between the pursuit of simplicity and the need for models sophisticated enough to capture the complexity of the world. In an era in which technology allows us to collect and analyze ever-increasing amounts of data and make increasingly precise measurements, Occam’s razor reminds us of the importance of not getting lost in unnecessarily complicated explanations, while at the same time keeping an open mind faced with the surprises that nature can still reserve for us.
For further information:
